
Syllabus for Problem Solving
Rohr Science 220 (619)
849-2604 gcrow@ptloma.edu
REQUIRED
MATERIALS
- Calculator: A scientific calculator is
recommended.
- Supplies: One 3.5" computer disk.
COURSE
PHILOSOPHY
"Today's world is more mathematical than yesterday's, and
tomorrow's world will be more mathematical than today's."
"...mathematics...serves as a key to opportunity and
careers."[ Everybody
Counts, p.45, p.3]
"To participate rationally in a world
where discussions about everything from finance to the
environment, from personal health to politics, are increasingly
informed by mathematics, one must understand mathematical methods
and concepts, their assumptions and implications." [ 50 Hours, p.35]
In view of these statements and many other
similar ones from national reports, this quantitative experience
(MTH 303) has been included as part of the PLNC general education
curriculum. Thus, all students will study "major concepts,
methods, and applications of quantitative reasoning with emphases
on active problem solving" [Catalog].
COURSE GOALS
The overall goal of the course is "to develop the ability to
solve nonroutine problems through dynamic processes"
[Catalog]. More specific goals are:
- To contribute to the student ability to
solve nonroutine problems.
- To expand the student methods of inquiry
and exploration.
- To contribute to the student ability to
form conjectures and check implications.
- To expand the student understanding of
major concepts, methods and applications of quantitative
reasoning.
- To help the student understand the role of
problems, problem solving and quantitative reasoning.
- To help the student see the role of
problem solving in modern society.
- To involve the student directly in various
problem solving activities.
- To help the student understand the meaning
of problem and problem solving.
The general method of the course is to involve
students in "dynamic processes of inquiry and exploration,
logical reasoning, making and testing conjectures, and
investigating implications of conclusions" [Catalog].
Specifically, the focus is on the processes and tools of
quantitative problem solving - learning what they are and
developing ability to use them.
COURSE
APPROACH
The ability to solve problems requires resourcefulness,
flexibility, and efficiency in dealing with new obstacles.
Research on teaching and learning problem solving suggests that
certain factors are critical to successful problem solving,
including resources, heuristics, control, and belief systems [Schoenfeld, 1985].
- Resources refers to whatever information
problem solvers understand (or misunderstand) that might
be brought to bear on a problem.
- Heuristic refers to strategies and
techniques problem solvers have (or lack) for making
progress when working on nonroutine problems.
- Control refers to the way problem solvers
use (or fail to use) the information at their disposal.
- Belief systems refers to the problem
solver's "world view" of the problem domain,
which determines the ways they use the knowledge in the
first three categories.
The approach in MTH 303 develops and uses these
factors to increase your problem solving ability. Classroom
techniques used include:
- the teacher as role model
- whole-class problem solving with teacher
as control
- small-group problem solving with teacher
as coach
In addition, you are assigned readings and
problems that will help you identify and make progress in the
four areas discussed above.
COURSE
METHODS
Use of groups. There is almost a century of research showing that
academic achievement, productivity, and self-esteem improve
dramatically when students work together in groups. This method
emphasizes teamwork, cooperation and support by others, rather
than isolation and competition in learning.
Role of the classroom instructor. There will be
less direct "lecturing" in class than usual, with many
questions "answered" by another question to help you
work through your own questions and difficulties. You are
expected to learn problem solving through active involvement -
reading, writing, and explaining to others what you are thinking
and doing.
This may require some adjustment in the way you
think about teaching and learning. Initially, you may wish for
more direct information and answers, but your patience and effort
will be rewarded with a deeper understanding and increasing
independence in problem solving, as well as confidence in your
ability to tackle new problems.
GRADING
POLICIES
Grading Distribution
| Three tests at 100 points each |
300 points |
| Final Exam |
250 points |
| Quizzes |
150 points |
| Homework |
150 points |
| Project |
100 points |
| Class Participation |
50 points |
| Total |
1000 points |
Grading scale. Grades are based on the number of points
accumulated throughout the course.
Approximate minimal percentages required to obtain a given grade
are:
Grading Scale in
percentages
| |
A |
B |
C |
D |
| + |
|
(87.5, 90) |
(77.5, 80) |
(67.5, 70) |
| |
[92.5, 100] |
[82.5, 87.5] |
[72.5, 77.5] |
[62.5, 67.5] |
| - |
[90, 92.5) |
[80, 82.5) |
[70, 72.5) |
[60, 62.5) |
Grade components. The grade
components are tests, quizzes, written assignments, projects,
essays, and the final examination. Other factors that affect
grades are
- Late work. A written
assignment or computer assignment is late if it is not
received at the beginning of class on the due date. Late
work need not be accepted. Work accepted late may be
assessed a penalty. Make-up tests (or the exam) will be
given only by arrangement with the instructor for reasons
of documented emergency.
- Questions on written assignments,
tests, and exams: Written assignments and
test/exam questions and problems must be formulated
carefully in terms of words and symbols used in the
course. Credit is determined by the degree to which
answers and solutions respond to the specific question or
problem stated. Maximize your credit by learning the
language and symbols of the course.
- Written Assignments.
Assignments collected must be prepared in a style
suitable for grading. The following guidelines are used
to determine credit:
- the organization must be easy to
follow
- the work must be legible
- complete solutions must be written
for problems (not just answers); answers must be
clearly marked
- use complete sentences to answer
questions
- Tests and Final Examination.
Tests and the final exam will include problems and
questions over material assigned in the text, readings
and handouts, as well as material presented in class.
ATTENDANCE POLICY.
After you miss the equivalent of 3 class periods, you will be
warned of impending de-enrollment. If you miss the equivalent of
6 class periods, you will be de-enrolled.
CLASSROOM ATTIRE.
All students are expected to dress in ways that allow the classroom
to be a place where all students are comfortable and can work
efficiently. Certain distracting attire is not permitted in the classroom. For example, attire associated with the "rush" activities
of fraternities and sororities simply causes too many distractions
in the classroom. If you choose to "rush" one of the fraternities
or sororities, please make sure the "rush" officials know that
"rush" attire will not be allowed in this classroom.
ACADEMIC ACCOMMODATIONS.
All students are expected to meet the standards for this course as
set by the instructor. However, students with learning disabilities
who may need accommodations must discuss options with the instructor
during the first two weeks of class and provide approved
documentation and verification of need.
CHEATING POLICY
A student who is caught cheating on a quiz will receive a zero on
that quiz and may receive a zero for all quizzes for the
semester. A student who is caught cheating on an exam will
receive a zero on that exam and may receive an "F" for
the semester.
THE
FINAL EXAM IS A COMPREHENSIVE
EXAMINATION.
REFERENCES
- Baron, J. B. and Sternberg, R. J. Teaching
Thinking Skills: Theory and practice. (1987). New York:
W. H. Freeman.
- Bransford, J. and Stein, B. (1984). The
Ideal Problem Solver. New York: W. H. Freeman.
- Brown, Stephen I., and
Marion I. Walter. (1983). The Art of Problem Posing.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Cheney, L. (Ed.) (19 ) 50
Hours (Cheney Report). HEW
- Curcio, F.R. (Ed.). (1987). Teaching and
Learning: A problem solving focus. Reston, VA: NCTM.
- Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving.
Psychological Monographs 58, No. 5 Whole # 270.)
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Dunham, William. (1990). Journey Through
Genius: The great theorems of mathematics. New York: John
Wiley & Sons.
- Eves, Howard. (1990). Foundations and
Fundamental Concepts of Mathematics. 3rd ed. Boston:
PWS-KENT.
- Eves, Howard. (1983). Great Moments in
Mathematics. (2 vols.). The Mathematical Association of
America.
- Gardner, Howard. (1985). The Mind's New
Science. New York: Basic Books.
- Hofmann, J. E. (1957). The History of
Mathematics. New York: Philosophical Library.
- Kilpatrick, Jeremy. (1987). "Problem
Formulating: Where Do Good Problems Come From?"
Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education, edited by
Alan H. Schoenfeld, pp. 123-48. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
- Kline, M. (1962). Mathematics: A Cultural
Approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Kline, M. (1953). Mathematics in Western
Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Krulik, S.
(Ed.). (1980). Problem Solving in School Mathematics.
1980 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
- National
Research Council. (1989).Everybody Counts: A
Report to the Nation on the Future of Mathematics
Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Newell, A., and Simon, H. (1972). Human
Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, J: Prentice-Hall.
- Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children,
computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
- Paulos, John A. (1988). Innumeracy:
Mathematical illiteracy and its consequences. New York:
Hill and Wang.
- Peterson, Ivars. (1988). The Mathematical
Tourist. New York: Freeman.
- Peterson, Ivars. (1990). Islands of Truth:
A mathematical mystery cruise. New York: Freeman.
- Polya, G. (1945). How To Solve It.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics and
Plausible Reasoning (2 vols.). Princeton: Princeton
University Press.
- Polya, G. (1962 [Vol. 1] and 1965 [Vol.
2]; combined paperback edition, 1981). Mathematical
Discovery. New York: Wiley.
- Polya, G., & Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.).
(1974). The Stanford Mathematics Problem Book with Hints
and Solutions. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Rolf, Howard L.
(1988). Mathematics. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
- Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving. New York:
Academic Press.
- Schoenfeld, A. (Ed.). (1987). Cognitive
Science and Mathematics Education. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence
Erlbaum.
- Steen, Lynn A. (Ed.) (1990). On the
Shoulders of Giants: New Approaches to Numeracy.
Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
- Tannenbaum, P. & Arnold, R. (1992).
Excursions in Modern Mathematics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
- Taylor A. (19950). Mathematics and
Politics. Strategy, Voting, Power, and Proof.
Springer-Verlag.
- Wickelgren, W. (1974). How to Solve
Problems. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Back to Greg Crow's Homepage
To Dept of Math & C.S.
To Point
Loma Nazarene University
Last modified on 17-Sep-2001
Send comments and suggestions to E-mail:
gcrow@ptloma.edu